Absolute
values and Evolution
Hyung
Jin, June 19, 2016
Sanctuary
Church sermon, Jun 20, 2016
This
is a presentation, which my wife created. It is a presentation that she gave to
her Korean class. It's an excellent
presentation because it deals with a very critical issue, and we've been
studying about the Kingdom and how one of the main elements of the Marxist 10
planks, or any type of archangelic system is to take control of the education
system. That's one of the keys. If you want to make a country archangelic, if
you want to make a country communist, socialist, etc. If you want to bring Satan’s power greater,
you have to control the public education system. That's what they always go
after, always going after the public school.
So this is very important because this is a topic, that, if you are an
adult with faith, maybe you don't wrestle with all the time, but as a young
person you are going to wrestle with this all the time. If you are in a school, if you are in
"higher education," it really should be called "higher
indoctrination," but that's what they call it, "higher
education." You will be
encountering these kinds of things. And the whole topic here is, of course,
evolution, or the evolutionist theory.
It's
so pervasive, it's so massively engrained in our subconscious; it's so
massively pumped down every young person's throat as they are developing. And we're not going to go through all these
slides, but even up to the tenth grade, you get 250 pages of evolution
teaching. So every year, you get hundreds and hundreds of pages of teaching of
evolution. That this is the matrix and framework in which we understand the
universe. So there are many different topics in this whole sphere of evolutionism,
which is another religion that is pushed on kids. At state religion, a
state-supported religion. And there's a
difference between micro and macro evolution, which we'll get into very
briefly, but two thirds of youth are leaving the Judeo-Christian faith after
high school. And there's a clear reason
why they are doing so. Of course the media is involved in all of this, but the
education system is so pervasive.
She
covers issues like the big bang theory, nothing from something.
Conflicts
with the law of biogenesis, which they teach in the biology books. They teach
that everything came from nothing. They totally contradict themselves all the
time. Conservation of angular momentum, and all these kinds of things she
covers, and goes into the notion of evolution, and the different forms of
evolution. And what is taught in school is what is known many times as macro
evolution, which is clothed as micro evolution. Macro evolution is where
[showing slide] you see this kind of horse and then it's morphing into a fox or
a fish which morphs into a reptile, etc. These kinds of things we've seen, and
so this is the macro evolutionary picture, and of course many of you have seen
the tree of life tree that Darwin drew, and that's presented in many biology textbooks
with all the different animals. You've got single cell amoebas, etc. And then
you've got fish, reptiles, and invertebrates before that, and then mammals, and
they just "Oh, they just kind of boom, boom, boom." They're presented
in that fashion, however there is, of course, no actual evidence for this type
of evolution. Zero. And so you'll see that in the video that comes up. The
video is a reality TV-based type of video. So, it's not a boring science type
of video, it's all reality-based, real people who are being talked to.
And,
of course, people confuse that with micro evolution, which is like the
differences in moths that you see, little adaptations. Some moths develop
different coloration in the Amazon, and the same type of moth will have
different coloration in Siberia, or wherever they are at. And you see Darwin's finches here at the
bottom, remember? He said, "Ooh, I went to the Galapagos Islands, and I
saw the finches, and some had adapted their beaks to become bigger or smaller,
but the point is that they are still birds. None of them adapted to jump to
another species, and so this is what is called micro evolution, and anybody who
is a thinker or even a creationist or any Christian person, one hundred percent
we believe in micro evolution, or what they call adaptation within a species,
that's not a problem. That's not a
problem whatsoever.
You
can have variation within a species like big dog, Great Dane, or small dog,
Chihuahua, or like my beautiful dogs, the Shih Tzus, you can have big
variation. But they're still dogs! They're
not a banana, they're not a tomato, and they're not an invertebrate,
right? And they never will be no matter
how many times you mate them; they never will become an asparagus root! [laughter]
Ok,
so this [showing slide] is the sort of tree of life that you see and this is
presented in so many textbooks across the board. There are some great
organizations out there that young people are very well aware of this,
Christian young people, Christian youth, aware of this type of ideology that's
being forced onto them. And of course,
this is how they present it in the textbooks. So here we have a bilaterally
symmetrical ancestor. Those of course are fancy words to confuse dumb young
kids, right? And then we have jumping
here, we have crayfish, and grasshoppers with wings, and this has jaws, and
here we have perch here, we have fish here, a frog, a pigeon, oh then have fish
here, then we get hit with a……."
And
kids see this, and say, "Oh, that's how it goes, ok, so it's all going to
be bilateral, symmetrical ancestors." So these are the kinds of pictures that they use to teach an ideology or
worldview and/or a view of the universe. Look how Pokémon is involved in this, Pokémon. Kids, if you know Pokémon, you know they try
to teach young kids about evolution, Pokémon, they actually ended up teaching
them micro evolution, and my wife made this fun slide showing that actually if
you're a Pikachu or a Pichoo, or whatever these guys are, whatever, I don't know,
you can't actually become a different species, you actually just become a
bigger type of Pikachu! So that actually confirms micro evolution! Not macro evolution.
So
in popular culture, you have all of these kinds of things. But there's a reason
why this kind of ideology is necessary for any archangelic ideology or
government system. It's very important for an archangelic government system or
kingdom. You also see this type of
picture, have you seen this? They make
it on shirts too, right, with the same kind of silhouettes, maybe they show a
"thinking man," hugging his cranium, or whatever. Of course this is totally not based on evidence;
there are no discoveries of fossils in these intermediary species. This is just
fantasy land; this is just mythology that they have drawn. And of course make
kids believe, but it's one hundred percent mythology.
There
are some examples here. These are some of the drawings that they create. They are saying that Lucy looks like
this. Notice how when they depict her,
they depict her with very human characteristics, maybe some times with whites
in her eyes to make it even more human, when, of course, if you go to any zoo
and you see gorillas, and those types of species have very black eyes, dark brown,
not white. Because if you have a white eye surrounding the pupil it looks like
you are a thinking person, it looks like you are thinking. So you'll see many biology textbooks present
Lucy, one of the supposed "missing links," as this thinking creature.
So
these are the real statistics of these various men that they say that they have
found, these intermediary species that they have found. Lucy, now nearly all
experts agree, Lucy was a three foot tall chimpanzee. The reason why she was so
small, the reason why she had bones that kind of looked like a chimpanzee was
that she was a chimpanzee!
[laughter] That would be an
explanation!
There
are other ones, like the Heidelberg Man, and they reconstructed this very
missing link type of creature that was conceded by many to be quite human, and
this was built from a jawbone that they found. So they found a jawbone, and
they reconstructed it magically to look just like that! Nebraska Man, look at this one. This was
scientifically built up from one tooth! They found a tooth. This was actually a big one in like the 1940s
to the 1960s, I believe. Nebraska
Man. So if you grew up in that time they
had this in biology textbooks, Nebraska Man was a big one. And this was reconstructed from a tooth. A tooth. A tooth made you see this guy! Whoopsy daisy!
Later that tooth was found to be the tooth of a pig. And then as soon as they
find one of these "proofs," they stuff it in the textbooks, and it's
there, and all the kids are learning, they're saying, "Oh, wow, yes, of
course there's no God, there's no supernatural force."
Piltdown
Man, look at Piltdown Man. Piltdown man, the jawbone turned out to belong to a
modern ape. Piltdown was a big one too,
from the 60s to the 80s. Piltdown was
actually shown to be from the jawbone of a modern ape. Peking Man, supposedly
500,000 years old, but of course the evidence disappeared about that. Neanderthal
Man, how many have heard of Neanderthal Man, right? At the International Congress of Zoology in
1958, Dr. A.G.E. Cave said that his examination showed that this famous
skeleton found in France over fifty years ago is that of an old man who
suffered from arthritis. Neanderthal Man could make fire, they already had
fire, and they could also reproduce with Homo Sapiens, which makes them Homo
Sapiens! Right?
You
either get ape or human. That's what you get. You don't get all these
intermediary species which they tried to fool young children with. New Guinea
Man down here, dates way back, this ancient creature dates way back to
1970. This species has been found in the
region just north of Australia, so they are calling indigenous Australian
people New Guinea Man. Considering that a different species of human being,
that's quite racist, isn't it? If you
want to talk about racism, that's real racist.
Cro-Magnon
Man, how many have heard of Cro-Magnon Man? One of the earliest and best
established fossils is at least equal in physique and brain capacity to modern
man. So what's the difference, there is not really a big difference with Homo
Sapiens. So you really either get ape or man.
Apes, obviously, no matter how much you reproduce, try to reproduce with
an ape; you'll never have a baby. Different species, right? Different species. And
of course, Modern Man, I think they put this in for a nice little twist, and a
nice little giggle. Modern Man, this genius thinks we came from a monkey! Professing themselves to be wise, they became
fools. Romans 1:22.
We
supposedly came from an ape, and then became a man, and we are the most evolved
of that species, and then, of course, we believe that we are apes. So, she
covers many other things. Fish, dinosaurs, the transition between fish and
dinosaurs and birds, etc.
Why
there are no intermediary species, especially if these intermediary periods
were millions and millions and millions of years long. You would have found plenty
of intermediary species. So she covers these kinds of things, the issue with
the archaeopteryx. There are some very standard, core examples presented in
biology textbooks worldwide in the "modern education," to convince
young and highly suggestible young children to believe in something without
evidence.
This
is the Tiktallik, you see the amazing picture of it as a fish, then it develops
some forms of fish-like legs, and then it's now walking like an alligator on
land. Of course there is absolutely no
evidence for this. But since they drew
it in a biology textbook, you have to believe it. Since it was drawn in a biology book, in
order to be modern, you have to believe that, even there is zero evidence for a
Mr. Tiktaalik. Toodle loo, Mr. Tiktaalik! Tiktaalik, this is just a fish! Some
fish even to this day, what are those things called, mudskippers? They can flop around; they've got little legs
that kick around. They are actually used for digging in the mud when it's the
dry season, or the low tide.
And
she goes into different large arguments that are made in these textbooks for
the idea of evolution, or the religion of macro evolution. And of course one of
the most famous ones is the Heckle's embryonic argument. It's the argument
that, "Ooh, look at all these various stages of embryonic development, and
we will see that actually they are very similar, see all those in the first stage
which are very similar? These are pigs
and humans and rabbits and chickens and turtles. See how they all have the same
type of embryo. We all kind of start
from the same thing, is the argument, right?
Of course, Heckle's history is interesting, because as he presented
these, he drew these drawings over here, and until the modern day, they
continue to arrive in biology textbooks like that, as the embryonic argument.
Of course,
this whole drawing was completely discovered to be a total falsehood. Heckle's
presentations were counted as fraud in the time of his day. However, evolution has continued to put these
fraudulent embryonic arguments into your children's textbooks even though they
were proven to be fraudulent. This is
one of the examples with the gill slits, and he was saying that the human
embryo has little bumps there which are kind of like the gill slits of fish,
the little bumps, and they become like gill slits, that those are some of our
vestigial organ. Things like that bird and reptile and fish, you see how these
gill slits that we have, we are the same. We came from birds and reptiles and
fish.
Unfortunately,
those little bumps in human embryos that they were calling gill slits become
your cricoid, all these different structures in your throat. Quite different
from gills that they purport to be. So they never have had anything to do with
breathing. And this example was given by Ken Hoven. There are many people with
different bumps and wrinkles on their face, but that guy's triple chin are not
gill slits, right? These are the actual
embryos and you can see the vast variety, very different in embryonic form. Yet,
of course, Heckle conveniently painted them in a very similar fashion, and of
course they always appear in this type of fashion in biology textbooks to this
day. But of course, you can see the huge
disparity of embryonic forms when they are small.
You can see the fraudulent paintings up here that are many times
in the biology textbooks of higher education, college. Yeah, you're really
being educated there with fraudulent material, and these are of course the
real, very vastly different structures.
The
Miller experiment, very famous one, which I won't go into detail about here,
all of those kinds of things she covered. Radio carbon dating. C-4 dating, the
unreliability of that type of dating that occurs. Different topics like
this. The whole point of this vestigial
organ, the whales have a vestigial organ that is no longer used, or the human being
has a tail bone, which we don't use.
Unfortunately, that coccyx, or what they call the tailbone, connects all
your tissue to your very important organs that you have down there that regulate
your bowel functions. And if you don't have it, it's going to be like a
mess! Literally, like a big mess. All the time. So they do perform a function.
And
of course, how useful would a tail be?
[showing slide] We would be able
to do groceries and open doors at the same time, and do computer work. Homologous structures, these are similar
structures in birds and animals, and human beings, or dogs and cats, etc. And
so in the past, people who understood about the Creator, would look at this and
say, "Oh yes, this points to a common Creator. Common design. Common
Creator. A common creator is building
things."
You
have a person that builds a motor car, has a luxury car. Another person builds an airplane, but
similar structures. Similar machines,
similar rotational devices, similar cylinders, whatever it is. There's common design. There's common intellect, right? Instead of course, the evolution perspective
that all these morph from a common ancestor.
Of course there is no proof for that.
In
the Cheon Seong Gyeong, Father actually speaks at length about evolution quite
a bit in Cheon Seong Gyeong if you look at it.
There are many, many dozens of scriptures about evolution and
showing how dangerous evolution was because what people don't understand about
evolution is that it's not only something that you learn for learning. It is a political machine. It's tied to
politics.
So
just like "health sciences" and teaching young kids how to have sex
at five years old, this is supposedly supposed to help them from contracting
STD's and things like this. All those things are tied with politics. All these
things were controlled by politics.
And
so, Hitler said, "Let me control the textbooks, I will control the
state." Centralizing governmental education is of course one of the
communist pillars, it's one of the ten pillars of Marx's absolute necessity for
a totalitarian state. And of course, we know that in the Cheon Il Guk
Constitution it's illegal because it's so absolutely dangerous. The problem
with evolution thinking, and it's not just little arguments in science or
experiments that we can now debunk --they have serious repercussions. Serious
repercussions.
Here
you can see of course, the great kill list of all genocidal maniacs in the
twentieth century -- Mao Tse Tung, Lenin, Stalin, Hitler -- all these guys, all
of them were huge proponents of evolution. Loved it. Loved it.
It was absolutely fantastic for them.
So evolution is not only a type of theory, it is not only a type
of blind faith without evidence, it's also a very dangerous political tool. Very
dangerous political tool. And as all
these totalitarians and dictators assumed power, one of the first things they
do to undermine Judeo-Christian values and/or morality, was to, of course,
implement the evolution teaching in the schools.
And
of course, offered free public education to all. Come and learn the new
religion. Which is of course, statism. The state is good, the government is
your daddy, the state loves you and will take care of you. And believe in the
state and in all the costumes and the parades and all the weird hats and all
those things. Believe in it, and you will have true happiness; you'll have true
freedom; you'll have a true life.
All
this tied with education from a young age of evolution teaching. Because you've
got to get people away from God, you've got to get them away and thinking God
is just a mythology, or it's something that's made up. Your parents taught you
that, and blah, blah, blah, you know young people always fall into that
trap. "Oh, your parents taught you
that. Oh no, that's not how the real world works." They always fall into that, every single
generation! That's how dumb those young
kids are. They can fall right into that trap every single time. The globalists
know it, the communists know it, and of course that's why they start young. They
start very young indoctrinating the kids with this type of teaching, which of
course is unscientific, as you will see in the video.
Cheon
Seong Gyeong
Father
wrote about evolution.
"This communist bloc propounded evolutionary theory,
whereas the religious realm insisted that there be a Creator. Hence, they fought with one another. What has been advocated by worldwide blocs
all ended in failure.
The world will become unstable without eliminating evolutionary
theory, and establishing the nucleus of absolute values based on a theory of
creation centered on the absolute God."
So
in the video that we're now going to see now, this was a video that compiled
reality TV-style, at the UCLA campus. UCLA is, of course, one of the most
prestigious institutions of "higher learning," especially for science
and biology, and all those things. So it's very highly respected for their
science etc. And so this video was created on that campus. You're going to see
a lot of these ideas that we just briefly covered real quick. They are going to
come up in that reality TV interaction, and if you keep your mind sharp, you'll
see a lot of issues are being covered. Lots and lots of issues.
But
this is so important to understand that these institutions of higher learning
have a very powerful veneer of authority in our culture. Especially for a young
person if you're trying to get into those schools, "Oh my gosh, I got into
UCLA. Whoo, and oh my goodness, my
professors are so brilliant and they're so learned, and wow!" You'll see some of the mesmerized children in
this video who actually think they are learned and logical. So that is the
background of this video.
The
reason why I wanted to show this is because evolutionary thinking, evolutionary
theory is so pervasive and it's a very dangerous form of political thought
because, think about it, all those genocidal maniacs used evolution in the end
to say, "Wait a minute, we all evolved from apes, so who is the most
evolved out of us?" Hitler said it
was them. The Japanese totalitarians said it was them, and other different
totalitarians said it was them, that evolved most from apes.
Which
then of course gives you a very convenient political tool to kill people
because they are less evolved. It's very cruel, but it's evolution and it is
the survival of the fittest. You see, so there are very grave political
consequences to this type of religiosity and/or belief. That's why this type of
thinking, when you look at the Cheon Seong Gyeong, Father really attacks a lot.
It's surprising how much Father attacks evolution theory because it creates the
foundational structure for Satan’s kingdom to be built in the modern world,
using "science" to prove it.
No comments:
Post a Comment