God-centered values ​​versus the theory of evolution

The nucleus of absolute values based on a theory of creation centered on the absolute God

Hyung Jin, June 19, 2016

This is a presentation, which my wife created. It is a presentation that she gave to her Korean class.  It's an excellent presentation because it deals with a very critical issue, and we've been studying about the Kingdom and how one of the main elements of the Marxist 10 planks, or any type of archangelic system is to take control of the education system. That's one of the keys. 

If you want to make a country archangelic, if you want to make a country communist, socialist, etc.  If you want to bring Satan’s power greater, you have to control the public education system. That's what they always go after, always going after the public school.  So this is very important because this is a topic, that, if you are an adult with faith, maybe you don't wrestle with all the time, but as a young person you are going to wrestle with this all the time.  

If you are in a school, if you are in "higher education," it really should be called "higher indoctrination," but that's what they call it, "higher education."  You will be encountering these kinds of things. And the whole topic here is, of course, evolution, or the evolutionist theory.

It's so pervasive, it's so massively engrained in our subconscious; it's so massively pumped down every young person's throat as they are developing.  And we're not going to go through all these slides, but even up to the tenth grade, you get 250 pages of evolution teaching. So every year, you get hundreds and hundreds of pages of teaching of evolution. That this is the matrix and framework in which we understand the universe. 

So there are many different topics in this whole sphere of evolutionism, which is another religion that is pushed on kids. At state religion, a state-supported religion. And there's a difference between micro and macro evolution, which we'll get into very briefly. 

But two thirds of our youth are leaving the Judeo-Christian faith after high school.  And there's a clear reason why they are doing so. Of course the media is involved in all of this, but the education system is so pervasive.

She covers issues like the big bang theory, nothing from something.

Conflicts with the law of biogenesis, which they teach in the biology books. They teach that everything came from nothing. They totally contradict themselves all the time. 

Conservation of angular momentum, and all these kinds of things she covers, and goes into the notion of evolution, and the different forms of evolution. And what is taught in school is what is known many times as macro evolution, which is clothed as micro evolution. Macro evolution is where [showing slide] you see this kind of horse and then it's morphing into a fox or a fish which morphs into a reptile, etc.

These kinds of things we've seen, and so this is the macro evolutionary picture, and of course many of you have seen the tree of life tree that Darwin drew, and that's presented in many biology textbooks with all the different animals. You've got single cell amoebas, etc. And then you've got fish, reptiles, and invertebrates before that, and then mammals, and they just "Oh, they just kind of boom, boom, boom." They're presented in that fashion. 

However there is, of course, no actual evidence for this type of evolution. Zero. And so you'll see that in the video that comes up. The video is a reality TV-based type of video. So, it's not a boring science type of video, it's all reality-based, real people who are being talked to.

And, of course, people confuse that with micro evolution, which is like the differences in moths that you see, little adaptations. Some moths develop different coloration in the Amazon, and the same type of moth will have different coloration in Siberia, or wherever they are at. 

And you see Darwin's finches here at the bottom, remember? He said, "Oh, I went to the Galapagos Islands, and I saw the finches, and some had adapted their beaks to become bigger or smaller, but the point is that they are still birds. None of them adapted to jump to another species, and so this is what is called micro evolution, and anybody who is a thinker or even a creationist or any Christian person, one hundred percent we believe in micro evolution, or what they call adaptation within a species, that's not a problem. That's not a problem whatsoever.

You can have variation within a species like big dog, Great Dane, or small dog, Chihuahua, or like my beautiful dogs, the Shih-Tzus, you can have big variation.  But they're still dogs! They're not a banana, they're not a tomato, and they're not an invertebrate, right?  And they never will be no matter how many times you mate them; they never will become an asparagus root!  [laughter]

Ok, so this [showing slide] is the sort of tree of life that you see and this is presented in so many textbooks across the board. There are some great organizations out there that young people are very well aware of this, Christian young people, Christian youth, aware of this type of ideology that's being forced onto them.

And of course, this is how they present it in the textbooks. So here we have a bilaterally symmetrical ancestor. Those of course are fancy words to confuse dumb young kids, right?  And then we have jumping here, we have crayfish, and grasshoppers with wings, and this has jaws, and here we have perch here, we have fish here, a frog, a pigeon, oh then have fish here, then we get hit with a……."

And kids see this, and say, "Oh, that's how it goes, ok, so it's all going to be bilateral, symmetrical ancestors." So these are the kinds of pictures that they use to teach an ideology or worldview and/or a view of the universe. 

Look how Pokémon is involved in this. Kids, if you know Pokémon, you know they try to teach young kids about evolution, Pokémon, they actually ended up teaching them micro-evolution, and my wife made this fun slide showing that actually if you're a Pikachu or a Pichoo, or whatever these guys are, whatever, I don't know, you can't actually become a different species, you actually just become a bigger type of Pikachu! So that actually confirms micro evolution!  Not macro evolution.

So in popular culture, you have all of these kinds of things. But there's a reason why this kind of ideology is necessary for any archangelic ideology or government system. It's very important for an archangelic government system or kingdom. 

You also see this type of picture, have you seen this?  They make it on shirts too, right, with the same kind of silhouettes, maybe they show a "thinking man," hugging his cranium, or whatever.  Of course this is totally not based on evidence; there are no discoveries of fossils in these intermediary species. This is just fantasy land; this is just mythology that they have drawn. And of course make kids believe, but it's one hundred percent mythology.

There are some examples here. These are some of the drawings that they create. They are saying that Lucy looks like this. Notice how when they depict her, they depict her with very human characteristics, maybe some times with whites in her eyes to make it even more human, when, of course, if you go to any zoo and you see gorillas, and those types of species have very black eyes, dark brown, not white. Because if you have a white eye surrounding the pupil it looks like you are a thinking person, it looks like you are thinking. So you'll see many biology textbooks present Lucy, one of the supposed "missing links," as this thinking creature.

So these are the real statistics of these various men that they say that they have found, these intermediary species that they have found. Lucy, now nearly all experts agree, Lucy was a three foot tall chimpanzee. The reason why she was so small, the reason why she had bones that kind of looked like a chimpanzee was that she was a chimpanzee! [laughter] That would be an explanation!

There are other ones, like the Heidelberg Man, and they reconstructed this very missing link type of creature that was conceded by many to be quite human, and this was built from a jawbone that they found. So they found a jawbone, and they reconstructed it magically to look just like that! 

Nebraska Man, look at this one. This was scientifically built up from one tooth! They found a tooth.  This was actually a big one in like the 1940s to the 1960s, I believe in Nebraska. So if you grew up in that time they had this in biology textbooks, Nebraska Man was a big one.  And this was reconstructed from a tooth. A tooth.  A tooth made you see this guy! Whoops! Later that tooth was found to be the tooth of a pig. And then as soon as they find one of these "proofs," they stuff it in the textbooks, and it's there, and all the kids are learning, they're saying, "Oh, wow, yes, of course there's no God, there's no supernatural force."

Piltdown Man, look at Piltdown Man. Piltdown man, the jawbone turned out to belong to a modern ape.  Piltdown was a big one too, from the 60s to the 80s.  Piltdown was actually shown to be from the jawbone of a modern ape. Peking Man, supposedly 500,000 years old, but of course the evidence disappeared about that. 

Neanderthal Man, how many have heard of Neanderthal Man, right?  At the International Congress of Zoology in 1958, Dr. A.G.E. Cave said that his examination showed that this famous skeleton found in France over 50 years ago is that of an old man who suffered from arthritis. Neanderthal Man could make fire, they already had fire, and they could also reproduce with Homo Sapiens, which makes them Homo Sapiens!  Right?

You either get ape or human. That's what you get. You don't get all these intermediary species which they tried to fool young children with. 

New Guinea Man down here, dates way back, this ancient creature dates way back to 1970.  This species has been found in the region just north of Australia, so they are calling indigenous Australian people New Guinea Man. Considering that a different species of human being, that's quite racist, isn't it?  If you want to talk about racism, that's real racist.

Cro-Magnon Man, how many have heard of Cro-Magnon Man? One of the earliest and best established fossils is at least equal in physique and brain capacity to modern man. So what's the difference, there is not really a big difference with Homo Sapiens. So you really either get ape or man.  Apes, obviously, no matter how much you reproduce, try to reproduce with an ape; you'll never have a baby. Different species, right? Different species. And of course, Modern Man, I think they put this in for a nice little twist, and a nice little giggle. 

Modern Man, this genius thinks we came from a monkey!  Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools. Romans 1:22. (Though they profess to be wise, they have become fools,) We supposedly came from an ape, and then became a man, and we are the most evolved of that species, and then, of course, we believe that we are apes. 

So, she covers many other things. Fish, dinosaurs, the transition between fish and dinosaurs and birds, etc.

Why there are no intermediary species, especially if these intermediary periods were millions and millions and millions of years long. You would have found plenty of intermediary species. 

So she covers these kinds of things, the issue with the Archaeopteryx.

There are some very standard core examples presented in biology textbooks worldwide in the "modern education," to convince young and highly suggestible young children to believe in something without evidence.

This is the Tiktallik, you see the amazing picture of it as a fish, then it develops some forms of fish-like legs, and then it's now walking like an alligator on land.  Of course there is absolutely no evidence for this.  But since they drew it in a biology textbook, you have to believe it.  Since it was drawn in a biology book, in order to be modern, you have to believe that, even there is zero evidence for a Mr. Tiktallik. Toodle loo, Mr. Tiktaalik! Tiktallik, this is just a fish! 

Some fish even to this day, what are those things called, mudskippers?  They can flop around; they've got little legs that kick around. They are actually used for digging in the mud when it's the dry season, or the low tide.

And she goes into different large arguments that are made in these textbooks for the idea of evolution, or the religion of macro-evolution. And of course one of the most famous ones is the Heckle's embryonic argument. 

It's the argument that, "Ooh, look at all these various stages of embryonic development, and we will see that actually they are very similar, see all those in the first stage which are very similar? 

These are pigs and humans and rabbits and chickens and turtles. See how they all have the same type of embryo. We all kind of start from the same thing, is the argument, right? Of course, Heckle's history is interesting, because as he presented these, he drew these drawings over here, and until the modern day, they continue to arrive in biology textbooks like that, as the embryonic argument.

Of course, this whole drawing was completely discovered to be a total falsehood. Heckle's presentations were counted as fraud in the time of his day.  However, evolution has continued to put these fraudulent embryonic arguments into your children's textbooks even though they were proven to be fraudulent.  

This is one of the examples with the gill slits, and he was saying that the human embryo has little bumps there which are kind of like the gill slits of fish, the little bumps, and they become like gill slits, that those are some of our vestigial organ. Things like that bird and reptile and fish, you see how these gill slits that we have, we are the same. We came from birds and reptiles and fish.

Unfortunately, those little bumps in human embryos that they were calling gill slits become your cricoid, all these different structures in your throat. Quite different from gills that they purport to be. So they never have had anything to do with breathing.

And this example was given by Ken Hoven. There are many people with different bumps and wrinkles on their face, but that guy's triple chin are not gill slits, right?  These are the actual embryos and you can see the vast variety, very different in embryonic form.

Yet, of course, Heckle conveniently painted them in a very similar fashion, and of course they always appear in this type of fashion in biology textbooks to this day. But of course, you can see the huge disparity of embryonic forms when they are small.

You can see the fraudulent paintings up here that are many times in the biology textbooks of higher education, college. Yeah, you're really being educated there with fraudulent material, and these are of course the real, very vastly different structures.

The Miller experiment, very famous one, which I won't go into detail about here, all of those kinds of things she covered. Radio carbon dating. C-4 dating, the unreliability of that type of dating that occurs. Different topics like this.  The whole point of this vestigial organ, the whales have a vestigial organ that is no longer used, or the human being has a tail bone, which we don't use.  

Unfortunately, that coccyx, or what they call the tailbone, connects all your tissue to your very important organs that you have down there that regulate your bowel functions. And if you don't have it, it's going to be like a mess!  Literally, like a big mess.  All the time. So they do perform a function.

And of course, how useful would a tail be?  [showing slide] We would be able to do groceries and open doors at the same time, and do computer work. Homologous structures, these are similar structures in birds and animals, and human beings, or dogs and cats, etc.

And so in the past, people who understood about the Creator, would look at this and say, "Oh yes, this points to a common Creator, common design, common Creator."  

A common creator is building things: "You have a person that builds a motor car, has a luxury car.  Another person builds an airplane, but similar structures. Similar machines, similar rotational devices, similar cylinders, whatever it is. There's common design. There's common intellect, right?

Instead of course, the evolution perspective that all these morph from a common ancestor. Of course there is no proof for that.

In the Cheon Seong Gyeong, Father actually speaks at length about evolution quite a bit in Cheon Seong Gyeong if you look at it.

There are many, many dozens of scriptures about evolution and showing how dangerous evolution was because what people don't understand about evolution is that it's not only something that you learn for learning.  It is a political machine. It's tied to politics.

So just like "health sciences" and teaching young kids how to have sex at five years old, this is supposedly supposed to help them from contracting STD's and things like this. All those things are tied with politics. All these things were controlled by politics.

And so, Hitler said, "Let me control the textbooks, I will control the state." 

Centralizing governmental education is of course one of the communist pillars, it's one of the ten pillars of Marx's absolute necessity for a totalitarian state. And of course, we know that in the Cheon Il Guk Constitution it's illegal because it's so absolutely dangerous. The problem with evolution thinking, and it's not just little arguments in science or experiments that we can now debunk, they have serious repercussions. Serious repercussions.

Here you can see of course, the great kill list of all genocidal maniacs in the twentieth century. Mao Tse Tung, Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, all these guys, all of them were huge proponents of evolution. They Loved it, loved it.  It was absolutely fantastic for them.

So evolution is not only a type of theory, it is not only a type of blind faith without evidence, it's also a very dangerous political tool. Very dangerous political tool. And as all these totalitarians and dictators assumed power, one of the first things they do to undermine Judeo-Christian values and/or morality, was to, of course, implement the evolution teaching in the schools.

And of course, offered free public education to all. Come and learn the new religion. Which is of course, statism. The state is good, the government is your daddy, the state loves you and will take care of you. And believe in the state and in all the costumes and the parades and all the weird hats and all those things. Believe in it, and you will have true happiness; you'll have true freedom; you'll have a true life.

All this tied with education from a young age of evolution teaching. Because you've got to get people away from God, you've got to get them away and thinking God is just a mythology, or it's something that's made up. Your parents taught you that, and blah, blah, blah, you know young people always fall into that trap.

"Oh, your parents taught you that. Oh no, that's not how the real world works."  They always fall into that, every single generation!  That's how dumb those young kids are. They can fall right into that trap every single time. The globalists know it, the communists know it, and of course that's why they start young. They start very young indoctrinating the kids with this type of teaching, which of course is unscientific, as you will see in the video.

In the Cheon Seong Gyeong,

True Father wrote about evolution

"This communist bloc propounded evolutionary theory, whereas the religious realm insisted that there be a Creator. Hence, they fought with one another. What has been advocated by worldwide blocs all ended in failure. 

The world will become unstable without eliminating evolutionary theory, and establishing the nucleus of absolute values based on a theory of creation centered on the absolute God."

So in the video that we're now going to see now, this was a video that compiled reality TV-style, at the UCLA campus. UCLA is, of course, one of the most prestigious institutions of "higher learning," especially for science and biology, and all those things. So it's very highly respected for their science etc. And so this video was created on that campus. You're going to see a lot of these ideas that we just briefly covered real quick. They are going to come up in that reality TV interaction, and if you keep your mind sharp, you'll see a lot of issues are being covered. Lots and lots of issues.

But this is so important to understand that these institutions of higher learning have a very powerful veneer of authority in our culture. Especially for a young person if you're trying to get into those schools, "Oh my gosh, I got into UCLA. Whoo, and oh my goodness, my professors are so brilliant and they're so learned, and wow!" You'll see some of the mesmerized children in this video who actually think they are learned and logical. So that is the background of this video.

The reason why I wanted to show this is because evolutionary thinking, evolutionary theory is so pervasive and it's a very dangerous form of political thought because, think about it, all those genocidal maniacs used evolution in the end to say, "Wait a minute, we all evolved from apes, so who is the most evolved out of us?" Hitler said it was them. The Japanese totalitarians said it was them, and other different totalitarians said it was them, that evolved most from apes.

Which then of course gives you a very convenient political tool to kill people because they are less evolved. It's very cruel, but it's evolution and it is the survival of the fittest. You see, so there are very grave political consequences to this type of religiosity and/or belief. That's why this type of thinking, when you look at the Cheon Seong Gyeong, True Father really attacks a lot. 

It's surprising how much Father attacks evolution theory because it creates the foundational structure for Satan’s kingdom to be built in the modern world, using "science" to prove it.

See the video and the dialogue

...........

Here is the dialogue script from the video

Are you an atheist? I am definitely an atheist, yes. Now why are you an atheist? Why am I an atheist? Because there is no God. Atheism assumes that you can disprove the existence to the God.

Agnostic is a more correct term, but I'm an atheist. Are you an atheist? Yeah. I am an atheist, yeah.

I am, yes. I am. So you're not an atheist? No.

So you're leaning that way because of evolution? Yeah. I don't believe in the, there's a guy in the sky that lives in the sky. You believe in evolution? Of course I do, yes.

Live science says of Darwinian evolution, it can turn dinosaurs into birds, apes into humans, and amphibious mammals into whales. What Darwin showed in his work on evolution and natural selection is that we don't need to invoke any supernatural force or power to account for the development of life through time on earth. The ongoing processes that are observable in today's world.

You think it's a belief? I think it's just fact. I think more like facts. There is too much evidence to ignore.

Do you think it's a belief? No, it's science. It's the way it happened. It's logical.

You know, all the scientists pretty much agree with it. It's more of a fact. When did you start to believe? Um, when I started to think for myself.

When did you start believing? Uh, when I took my first biology class. It all started to make a lot of sense. The teacher made it very, very easy to understand.

I generally trust the scientific community. It makes more sense than any religion or anything. The fossils they found of all the cavemen, the homo sapiens, the dinosaurs, it shows clear evidence.

I believe in science. What's your major here at this university? Biology. You're a biology mate? Yeah.

You believe in evolution? Yes. What's your major? Geology. Chemistry.

Biochemistry. Environmental science and policy. I'm a physicist.

Biochemistry. Hey, do you believe in evolution? Uh, yes, I do. Do you believe in evolution? Yes, I do.

Of course. Yes, I do. I do believe in evolution.

You believe in evolution? Yes. Are you a strong believer? Yes. Are you a strong believer? Yep.

Yes. Yes. Absolutely.

A scientific method is based on the collection of data through observation and experimentation. Science Daily. Could you give me some observable evidence that evolution is true? Something I don't have to receive by faith.

Yeah. Some observable evidence. I mean, take a look at what happened 65 million years ago.

Hang on, I can't. That's 65 million years ago. I believe, yeah, millions of years.

So that can't be observed. We can trace the evolution through the fossil record. Would you be specific? Just give me one.

Um, between six and seven million years ago. Hundreds of thousands to millions of years? So it's quite a long time. Yes.

Millions of years. Yes. So it can't be observed.

Evolution is, is not testable over time. We are condemned to live only for a few decades. And that's too slow, too small a time scale to see evolution going on.

Richard Dawkins. We see nothing of these slow changes in progress until the hand of time has marked the lapse of ages. Charles Darwin.

You've got the canine kind, the coyote and the domestic dog. And there's the feline kind, which is the cats, the tiger and the kitten. And you've got humankind.

So Darwin said there'd be a change of kinds over many years. So could you give me one example of observable evidence of a change of kinds? For instance, the fossil record shows the common ancestors of all carnivores that cats and dogs were once linked, once united by a common ancestor. How long ago? This, I believe, was like 60 million years ago.

I don't want something I have to accept by faith. I want it to be observable. Observable evidence.

I mean, if you're just asking me here on the street, there's not really much I can tell you in terms of observable evidence. We would have to really examine existing data to draw conclusions of our own. I would have to have faith then.

We would have to have some amount of faith. Can you think of any observable evidence for Darwinian evolution where he said there'd be a change of kinds? Monkey to man, is that what you're talking about? Yeah, a change of kinds. I don't really believe there's any proof for that yet.

Wild monkeys are the only ones with the fifth digit, like we have. Koalas have a fifth digit, did you know that? I didn't know that. Do you think we were evolved from koalas? No.

When I went to Washington, D.C., I saw they had a whole exhibit just on the... On the Smithsonian? Yeah, on the Smithsonian. Oh wait, so that is just like some stuffed dummies, like Standard Man of Fire. I know that everyone talks about the missing link for humans and whatnot.

I believe that there are connections that are out there that we haven't found yet. I'm going to trust what those experts did, those experts came up with. I have a strong trust in evolutionary ideas based on the evidence presented.

Can you think of any observable evidence for Darwinian evolution, a change of kinds? I haven't seen it myself, but I believe what the textbooks tell me about it, so... You've got faith in the experts? I have faith in the experts, yeah. I guess similar to how religious people have faith that God actually exists, I have faith in the experts knowing what they're talking about. The scientific method must be observable and repeatable, so could you give me one piece of observable evidence for Darwinian evolution? Okay, I would point to... One great example is, look at the genetics of the stickleback.

What's that? So stickleback fish are a very interesting collection of species that were recently isolated after the end of the Ice Age. What did they become? They're various species of sticklebacks. They stayed as fish? Well, of course.

Can you think of any observable evidence where there was a change of kinds? Fish. Human beings are still fish. Human beings are fish? Why, yes, of course they are.

How long did that take? A couple of billions of years, millions. A couple of millions? How is that observable? It's not. We came out of the ground as a mammal, and one mammal created... Come out of the ground? Didn't we come out of the sea? Well, initially in the beginning, we came out of the ground and the sea after the great destruction of the... So did we have lungs or gills when we came out of the sea? You want to know something? Those that were in the sea, I guess, had gills, and those that were on land had lungs.

But if we came out of the sea, we had gills in the sea. You want to know something? Who knows that when we came out of the sea or we came out, we evolved from mammals? So you don't know? Of course I don't know. I'm accepting that they did their science correctly.

Would you give me an example of Darwinian evolution, not adaptation or speciation, but a change of kinds? These are changes of kinds. They're still fish. They're distinctly different fish.

We have thousands of examples. Can you give me one? I can give you thousands, just one. For instance, I would say, look at Lenski's experiments with bacteria then.

So what did the bacteria become? The bacteria are still bacteria, of course. That's not Darwinian evolution. That's not a change of kinds, is it? It is a change in the genetic makeup of the bacteria, which is still bacteria.

So what did the bacteria become? A new kind of bacteria. It's still bacteria. There's no change of kinds.

To summarize, the observable evidence that you give me for Darwinian evolution is bacteria becoming bacteria. No, it is bacteria acquiring new metabolic capabilities. You said before that there is lots of evidence for evolution.

I just want one observable evidence for Darwinian evolution, just one. Well, I gave you some. You don't want... Not some.

I want one. You don't want that. I want one.

Yes, I do. I'm pleading with people. You asked me to tell you when I've watched one species evolve into another.

Isn't that right? No, one kind into another. There's 14 different definitions of species. So I want a change of a kind.

When you're talking about kinds or change in families, you're actually talking about macro evolution. You're talking about changes on the level that separates, say, cats from dogs. So could you give me any examples of Darwinian evolution? Well, when you say examples of that, then you have to sort of look at over a longer time frame.

It has nothing to do with faith. Faith is something that I have to... Unseen. I have to believe it.

That's it. Unseen. Look, do you believe evolution? Of course I do.

Are you a believer in evolution? Yes, I am. When did you start to believe evolution? I started to believe evolution when I started to think for myself. Is evolution a belief? Well, you know something? Evolution is a thought process.

This is coming to terms and checking out all the alternatives. Like taking a look at the religion, man-made religions. Let me ask you again, is evolution a belief? No, evolution is... Well, yeah, in a word, yeah, I could say it could be a belief.

When you say change of kinds, you mean the evolution of one species from another or to another. Yes, we have that in action, actually, in the Galapagos. Could you give me one instance? Yeah.

We have an example from a group of birds called Darwin's finches. You take a look at the difference between the finches on the islands that all started out. I mean, that's very, very observable.

That's not Darwinian evolution. There's been no change of kinds. What did the finches become? They become genetically new and anatomically new, recognizably different species.

They're still finches? Well, of course, they're still finches. Yeah, there's no change of kind. Little birds that he had observed that... What did they become? Their beaks, their beak shapes.

They're still birds? Yes. Three finches that turned into different types of birds. They're still finches? Well, for example, Darwin and his study on evolution of the birds on the island that he went on to there.

Their beaks changed? Their beaks. They're still birds. There's no change of kinds.

That's within the kind. Evolution on the beaks. So that's called adaptation.

It's not Darwinian evolution. There's no change of kinds. There's no different animal involved.

I want something that shows me Darwin's belief in the change of kinds as scientific. Darwin spoke of a change of kind. Can you think of any observable evidence for Darwinian evolution where there's a change of kind? Uh, change of kind, kind.

Uh, I'm gonna have to think about that one a little longer. You give me anything that I can see, observe, and test, which is the scientific method for Darwinian evolution, a change of kinds. Test and observe.

Could you give me observable evidence, which is the scientific method for Darwinian evolution, a change of kinds? Got it. Um, so you want the evidence of it. I would say I cannot, I think.

Um, hmm. It's a hard question, actually. So can you repeat the question again? Could you give me any observable evidence, just one? For Darwinian evolution.

Yeah, let me think about that for a sec. Observable evidence, something where we don't have to exercise faith. Something that can be observed, like the scientific process, observable.

Hmm, that's a good question. That one I'm not quite sure. You can't think of any observable evidence for evolution? No.

How do you know it's true? I'm not sure. So Darwinian evolution is not observable, it's not scientific. I guess so.

So it's unscientific, you can't prove it. It is scientific, actually. You could prove it.

It could be proven, just... Do it for me. Ah, that's hard. I don't, I don't, it's just, that's just too broad of a... It's unobservable, that's why you need millions of years.

Yes, exactly. You're trusting the biology majors and the biology professors know what they're talking about. Yeah.

And they can't even give me, they can't even give me evidence of a change of kinds. Well, I'm, well then there isn't one. If they don't give it, then I don't, I wouldn't say there was.

Yeah, I just go on what I've seen and what I've learned from class. So you believe? Yeah. You know what that's called? What? Line faith.

Line faith. Faith is the great copper, the great excuse to evade the need to think and evaluate evidence. Richard Dawkins.

Do you believe in intelligent design? Of course not. Do you think everything is intelligently designed? Um, no, I don't believe that things are intelligently designed. Okay, you seem like an intelligent person, so I'm going to ask you something.

I'd like you to make me a rose. Okay. How would you make a rose? I don't have the, the, the capabilities to do that.

Hang on. No, it's not intelligently designed. So you should be able to whip me up a rose real quick.

Do you believe a rose is intelligently designed? Definitely not. In order for me to know what to make, I have to know what a rose is. Well, it's got a seed.

So you've got to start with nothing and you've got to create a seed from nothing. Oh. Can you do that? No, I can't.

Could you make a rose from nothing? No. Can't make something from nothing. It's, it's just basic, you know, science.

A rose from nothing? A rose. Just like, I can't, honestly. Why not? Me, I just, I have no supernatural abilities.

All the geniuses in the world can't make a grain of sand from nothing. We don't know where to start. I can't.

Why not? I don't have millions, billions of years. That would be physically impossible. I mean, I would have to, that's, that's not possible.

So how could you say everything is not intelligently designed? Where does that leave you on the scale of intelligence? If you say everything's not intelligently designed and you can't even make a rose. Why do you think there's no one teaching intelligent design at UCLA? Because they're not allowed to. We can teach anything we want.

There's a reason intelligent design isn't taught in our learning institutions. According to physicist Victor Stenger, the legal staff of Freedom from Religion Foundation, a church-state watchdog group, has had remarkable success in convincing many institutions, such as school boards and town councils, that they are breaking constitutional law when they sponsor sectarian activities. That includes intelligent design.

When the authorities can't be convinced, Freedom from Religion Foundation sues, and it wins more often than not. There was nothing in the beginning, big explosion of nothing. It became something and then it came into a rose and giraffes and horses and cows.

I'm not saying that that's what happened. I'm just saying I don't know what happened. And that's what scientists have theorized has happened.

And we believe them. To a point. So you've got faith.

That is true, yeah. Could you give me a definition of vestigial? How's that back up? Vestigial is like, I'm not a biologist, so I'm kind of fuzzy here, but it's like a remaining organ that is not used. Like, for instance, our appendix.

Rabbits have huge appendix for digestion of grass. We still have a vestigial appendix. The appendix has no use.

Which we can think of right now. You're a coccyx bone. That was, you know, many people regard that as the tail of the humans.

The human tailbone is said to be vestigial. That is, it's an evolutionary leftover proving that we're related to primates. However, it's not a tailbone.

It's the coccyx vertebrae. The tailbone derived its name because some people believe it's a leftover part from human evolution, though the notion that the tailbone serves no purpose is wrong. The coccyx is an extremely important source of attachment for tendons, ligaments and muscles.

Evolutionists also claim that the appendix is vestigial, but it's not. The appendix is actually part of the human immune system. According to Scientific American, For years, the appendix was credited with very little physiological function.

We now know, however, that the appendix serves an important role in the fetus and in young adults. Among adult humans, the appendix is now thought to be involved primarily in the immune functions. I would consider myself an atheist.

Can you think of any famous atheists? I believe Neil deGrasse Tyson. Neil deGrasse Tyson said, I can't agree to the claims by atheists that I'm one of that community. Can you name a few? Famous atheists.

Apparently not. Start with Isaac Newton. Isaac Newton said, The most beautiful system of the sun, planets and comets could only proceed from the counsel and dominion of an intelligent and powerful being.

Can you think of any famous atheists? Yeah, no. A famous atheist. Yeah, a famous atheist.

Yeah, my dad. He's not famous. Skeptics' websites often include examples of famous atheists in an attempt to win converts.

But more often than not, the famous personalities cited are not actually atheists. This is a popular atheist poster on which are Ernest Hemingway, Abraham Lincoln, Carl Sagan, Mark Twain, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, Albert Einstein and Charles Darwin, along with the words, Atheism, good enough for these idiots. Clearly, atheism is for intellectuals.

But one moment, Abraham Lincoln wasn't an atheist. He said, I know that the Lord is always on the side of the right, but it's my constant anxiety and prayer that I and this nation should be on the Lord's side. Neither was Carl Sagan.

He clearly stated, I am an agnostic. Mark Twain hated religion, but he certainly wasn't an atheist, saying, None of us can be as great as God, but any of us can be as good. Benjamin Franklin said, God governs in the affairs of men.

You'll find Thomas Edison listed on celebrity atheists, on positive atheism and other atheist websites. But he wasn't an atheist. He said, There is a great directing head of people and things, a supreme being who looks after the destinies of the world.

Thomas Jefferson said, Say nothing of my religion. It is known to myself and my God alone. Albert Einstein rejected the Bible as the word of God and said that the creator was unknowable and the God being personal was childlike.

He lamented, In view of such harmony in the cosmos, which I, with my limited human understanding, am able to recognize, there are yet people who say there is no God. But what really makes me angry is that they quote me to support such views. He categorically said, I am not an atheist.

And when referring to those who deny the creator, he used the term fanatical atheists. Charles Darwin said, I have never been an atheist. So out of the eight famous men on the poster, there was only one who was an atheist, Ernest Hemingway.

According to his biographer, back in 1961, Hemingway quote, There's your poster boy when it comes to atheism. Keep in mind that even though some of these men claim to believe in God, it doesn't necessarily mean that they're believers in the one true creator revealed in the scriptures or that they're genuine Christians. However, when atheists use theists or agnostics to promote their godless agenda, they're being dishonest.

Then again, coming from those who claim that morality is relative to each person, convenient dishonesty should not be a surprise. Do you believe in moral absolutes? No, I do not. Is rape wrong? Rape is wrong in our culture.

Yes. Is rape always wrong? It depends on your beginnings. If you say that you have a respect for other human beings, then yes, rape is always wrong.

So there are moral absolutes. Is rape absolutely wrong? In my opinion, it is. Who makes the rules? We do.

So if Hitler made the rules and he had the majority. If Hitler made the rules, yes, we would be living in a society that Hitler would consider moral, but which I would not consider moral. Did Hitler put into practice survival of the fittest? No.

What was he doing then? He was murdering people. That's survival of the fittest. That's survival of the fittest.

It's the lion eating the antelope. Uh, no, there's much more to evolution than just this kind of crude kill and be killed model that you have in your head. I have seen a quote from Richard Dawkins saying evolution in its rawest is incredibly cruel.

It is, yes. Was Hitler putting evolution into practice? That does not mean it was moral. Nobody was immoral.

Nobody's claiming that evolution is a moral process. Evolution is a very harsh and cruel process. Do you believe in evolution? Yes, I do.

You have a dog? Yes. Love your dog? I do love my dog. Yes, I do.

I love animals. Okay. While your pet dog and your rotten neighbor are drowning, you'd only save one of them.

Who would you save? Hmm. That is a tough one. You'd only save one? Why are you hesitating? I think I would save my dog.

I don't know why I'm really hesitating. Because I don't know. I feel like people would see me as a bad person if I said the dog.

I'll save my dog. So, is your neighbor not worth saving? Well, he's not worth saving more than my dog is. I'd go with the dog.

I mean, you would want to save the animals. I would want to save my dog. Well, we're animals.

I believe we're all equal. I don't think humans have, like, a higher, like, place. So, you think dogs are more valuable than human beings? Do you believe in evolution? Yes, I do.

So, it's just a matter of survival of the fittest. Your neighbor's a primate. And you've got a canine, and you like the canine more than you like the primate.

Would that be right? Pretty much, yeah. I mean, survival of the fittest. I mean, survival of the fittest? Yeah, pretty much.

You said you believe in evolution. So, it's just a matter of survival of the fittest. Yeah.

He drowns, he drowns. Big deal. Yeah.

Oh, yeah. That is true. Are you an atheist? Yeah.

Any fetus is less human than an adult pig. Richard Dawkins. So, you don't think God exists? More like, I know.

Are you comfortable talking about spiritual things? I don't know much about them, because they're not really capable of knowledge. Once we're dead, we stop that. We stop that.

How do you know? Because it's just what the facts are. Like, if you stopped breathing right now, you'd be considered dead. Jake, if you were a car, and your motor got turned off, that'd be right.

That's inanimate. But you're a living, biological human being with a life of God in you. We are a mechanical being, because we have different parts that work.

Is there no life in you? Yes, there's life in me. That's your soul. Okay, can you handle some questions? They're pretty pointed questions.

Sure. Are you a good person? Are you going to make it to heaven? Um, I would like to think so. Do I think I'm a good person? Yeah.

Are you a good person, morally? Yes, I am. Do you think you're a good person? Yes. I like to believe so, yeah.

How many lies have you told in your whole life? I wouldn't be able to count. I don't know if I could remember. Can you be honest with me? Yeah.

How many lies do you think you've told in your whole life? Oh, quite a few. Countless? Uncountable. What would you call me if I told lots of lies? Countless lies.

You'd call me a liar, wouldn't you? Of course. What do you call someone who's told thousands of lies? A liar. So what are you? I'm a liar.

Have you ever stolen something in your whole life, even if it's small? Yes, I have. Have you ever taken something that belonged to someone else? Of course. Sure.

Yes, I have. It's called theft. So what are you? A liar and a thief.

I'm a liar and a thief. Have you ever used God's name in vain? Oh, every day. Have you ever used God's name in vain? Oh, all the time.

Have you ever used God's name in vain? F***, it's probably so. Have you ever used God's name in vain? Yep, I have indeed. It's called blasphemy.

It's very serious to use God's name as a cuss word. I don't believe in blaspheming since I don't believe in God. So if you don't believe in God, how can you blaspheme? Well, if I don't believe in certain laws and still violate them, ignorance of the law is no excuse.

So we're still guilty even though we deny a law exists or even don't know about it. Want to go and appreciate your honesty, Jacob. Jesus said if you look at a woman and lust for her, you commit adultery with her in your heart.

Have you ever looked at a woman with lust? Why, yes, I look at many women with lust in my heart. Of course. Have you ever looked at a guy with lust? With lust? Lust.

Oh, yeah. Sure. Not recently.

I have indeed. Are you having sex outside of marriage? No, not yet. Are you looking at pornography? Yes.

Are you lusting after women? Of course. Have you ever looked at a woman with lust? Absolutely. Peter, by your own admission, you're a lying thief, a blasphemer, and an adulterer at heart.

And that's only four of the ten commandments. What I'm saying to you is just not believing in hell doesn't make you go away. A judge must see that justice is done if he's a good judge.

And it's the same with God. If we die in our sins, God will give us justice. Bible says no thief, no liar, no fornicator, no blasphemer, no adulterer will inherit the kingdom of God.

So, Julia, if you died in your sins and God gave you justice because he's holy and perfect morally, you'd end up in hell and I'd hate that to happen to you. Man, would you sell one of your eyes for a million dollars? Probably not, no. Both for a hundred million? No, I value seeing too much.

See how precious your eyes are to you. How much more precious is your life? And you're saying, I don't care if I get damned from all that which is good. Of course you care.

You've got a will to live. Now, let me tell you something you know intuitively. You know that creation is proof of the creator.

God's given you that light. Proof of creator. Yes, we do.

We don't, actually. Inside story. I have a whistleblower and it tells me that you know God exists and the reason you choose evolution is because it gets rid of moral accountability.

Evolution... It does not get rid of moral accountability. It does. It means your primal instincts, lust and pornography and fornication, adultery, all just primal instincts.

That's all. You're just an animal. The Bible demands moral accountability and says those things are wrong and that's why it's not acceptable to you.

That's why you're not seeking after truth. Am I wrong? Am I wrong? I think you're wrong. I say that you know intuitively that creation is proof of the creator.

God has given you that inner light. So when you look at the genius of God's creative hand, you know he exists because of creation. You are a unique human being made in the image of God with a sense of justice and truth and righteousness.

God gave you a conscience. It's inherent. It's shaped by society but it's inherent.

You know right from wrong. You're violated as law and I don't want you to end up in hell. James, if you put your finger on it and see if we can, your struggle at the moment is because of your love of sin.

Because of the pleasure that sin gives you and you don't want to give it up. You're like a man with a money belt filled with gold who's just fallen into the ocean. I'm saying if you don't get rid of that belt that weighs 80 pounds, it's going to take you under.

It doesn't matter how much pleasure it gives you. It's not worth losing your life for. Gail, you're not a beast.

You're a human being created by God in his image with dignity and worth and purpose. Do you know what God did for guilty sinners so we wouldn't have to go to hell? Any idea? Mm-mm. No.

Well, God became a human being 2,000 years ago, Jesus of Nazareth, and he suffered and died on a cross taking the punishment for the sin of the world. You and I violated God's law and Jesus paid our fine. That means God can legally dismiss our case because of the suffering, death, and resurrection of the Savior.

God can say you're out of here because someone paid your fine. And then what God can now do is clothe us in the righteousness of Christ. So on judgment day, you're saved from God's wrath and his justice because of the death and resurrection of the Savior.

If you repent and trust in him, God will give you a righteous standing in his eyes. He'll wash away your sins in an instant. He'll grant you the gift of everlasting life.

His last words on the cross were, It is finished. In other words, the debt has been paid. He came to take our punishment upon himself.

So because our fine was paid by another, God can legally dismiss your case. It's very hard to believe that someone would be willing to pay off the debts that's not his own. The Bible says God is love, you know, and he's kind and generous and merciful.

And in his great kindness, he became a human being and suffered for us. Does that make sense? Makes sense, yeah. How old are you? I'm 22.

When are you going to die? I have no idea. Well, God knows exactly the moment of your death. And it could be tonight, could be tomorrow.

I'm not using scare tactics. This is just straight reality. 150,000 people every 24 hours die.

And they're all making plans for next week, no doubt. So please think about this. Do you have a Bible at home? No.

I'm not talking about a religion that says you've got to strive to get to heaven. I'm telling you, the Bible says heaven is a free gift of God. You cannot earn everlasting life.

Doesn't matter how religious you are, how good you are. God commended his love toward us and that while we are sinners, Christ died for us. And then he rose from the dead and defeated death.

This is how the Bible puts it. For by grace are you saved through faith and that not of yourselves. It's the gift of God, not of works least any man boasts.

So eternal life is a free gift of God. And it comes because of God's mercy, not because of anything we do. Make sense? Yeah.

Makes sense. Do you have a Bible at home? Yes. I've been reading the Bible every day for more than 40 years.

There's no mistakes in it, Mike. Any mistakes that we think are our mistakes. And you can trust God's word.

I mean, think of how you trust professors and science books that tell you you're a primate. You trust and believe that. So how much more should you trust a God who cannot lie? Let me show you how fallible we are.

Spell the word shop. Shop. Shop.

S-H-O-P. What do you do when you come to a green light? Stop. Green light.

So we're all fallible. We make mistakes. Imagine if you're making a mistake when you say this whole of creation came together because some explosion of nothing that produced everything, seasons, the birds, the trees, the flowers, the sun, the moon, the stars, and the marvels of the human body.

Are you going to think about this? Oh, yeah. No, I think about this quite a lot. Believe me.

My brother, like I said, he's a hardcore Christian. He's going to Yale Divinity School right now. So he talks to me about this all the time.

So you've got to think seriously about this. Life is full of decisions. Soften your heart.

Don't have so much blind faith in what science tells you. It's left you without any knowledge of what was in the beginning anyway. You haven't got a clue where you come from.

You don't know what you're doing here on earth. You don't know what happens after you die. Peter, could you be wrong about God's existence? Yes.

And could you be wrong about God's existence? No. Well, then I think you're rather close-minded. Well, if I say to you, could you be wrong about your wife's existence? You'd say, no, I know her.

You'd say, don't be ridiculous. I know her and love her. And I know the Lord and I love the Lord.

He transformed my life 41 years ago instantly overnight, forgave my sins and gave me new desires when I had no desires or thoughts of God for the whole 22 years before I was a Christian. Mike, thanks for talking to me. I appreciate it.

Yeah, of course. No problem. Thank you.

One more thing, because you're a very intelligent man. Spell the word shop. Shop? Like S-H-O-P? S-H-O-P? What do you do when you come to a green light? You stop.

Green light. Hmm? Green light. Oh, very good.

You go, Petey, you've been a good sport. Thank you very much for talking to me. Okay.

I generally don't engage creationists because it's not good for my blood pressure. So you're going to think about this? I think about it a lot, actually. Like, I think about death and how fragile life is and how just in a second it could all be over and there'd be nothing.

You know, the problem with those who are unable to see evolution, I think, is they don't have imaginations. Anatomical clues to human evolution from fish. Human beings are still fish.

Human ears evolved from ancient fish gills. We came out of the ground as a mammal. Heavier dinosaur arms led evolution to birds.

Do you think we're related to pigs? Do you think we've got a common ancestor in pigs? Yes. Proof that fearsome T-Rex evolved into a chicken. Do you think you're a primate? Yes, I am.

Are you a talking primate? I am. Are you a cousin of bananas? Why, yes. When whales walked the land.

I'm accepting that they did their science correctly. I generally trust the scientific community. I'm going to trust what those experts did, those experts came up with.

Darwinian evolution rests on faith. Once again, according to Richard Dawkins, faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to evade the need to think and evaluate evidence. Darwinian evolution requires great faith.

The knowledge of God, however, is clearly seen by all mankind. But since the creation of the world, his invisible attributes are clearly seen being understood by the things that are made, even as eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse. Because although they knew God, they did not glorify him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts and their foolish hearts were darkened.

Professing to be wise, they became fools. All right, all right. Thank you for taking the time to watch Evolution vs God.

Let's stop there. See, so what a wonderful ministry, Living Waters Ministry. You know, this is what the Christian community is doing.

And you know, they're exposing the reality that kids are brainwashed. Did you see how those kids, did you see how adamant they were in the beginning? Oh yeah, evolution, of course it's true, of course. Do I believe it? Of course.

But as they got asked real questions, these are real people, you could see it dissected and you could see it break down. You could see they're just indoctrinated. So this is, of course, a very important part of understanding, you know, freedom society and why public education is illegal in the kingdom.

It's illegal because these kind of things happen. And controllers and or totalitarians always want these type of ideologies to rise because they want to spread moral relativism. And remember the last questions he asked them, do you believe in moral absolutism? Do you believe rape is wrong? Oh, well, sometimes maybe according to culture, etc.

So it becomes relative. And so when moral absolutes break down, then society actually breaks down. The cultural realm, the moral realm, everything breaks down.

And we have this case, of course, in now what's happening in the UK, in Europe, and also the United States, because it's become so multicultural. We're so unbelievably different many times from our own neighbors. We don't even interact with our neighbors because it's so much work.

I don't even know their culture, their language, their ethnicity, their whatever. There are things that they came from and said, I don't even know it. Okay, I'm just gonna stay home.

And it creates this type of the quote diversity or cultural enrichment is what they call it in Europe, which, of course, is imploding under the weight of a new civilization moving in, is, of course, what strategically over time has always been used by Satan and Archangel to divide, conquer places. Okay, so the Chinese Constitution addresses these things. But I thank God for these kind of Christian ministries that are out there, that are actually exposing.

You see, this is they're out there on the streets, and they're interviewing these people in the real so you can see it for your own self, right? A lot of young people, if you see those kids look just like you, right? So they're no different than you or anything else. But when young people get to see other kids like, oh, wow, yeah, maybe when I get to college and I'm surrounded with kids like that, hey, maybe I gotta keep thinking. I have to keep thinking and not just accepted by peer pressure, right? So these kind of things are very important for freedom and responsibility to actually arise and for the kingdom to come.

Okay, so anyways, I thought it was a wonderful. I wanted to share that with you to take a little break from the, you know, just the study of the kingdom series that we're doing now, take a little break from that, but to understand why this is important. You know, this ideological battle is really critical, really critical.

It is still the battle between God and deceptive ideologies, which of course lead to the same place. All right, so as we are now in this tribulation time, but also we're moving forward, let's be aware of those things. You know, empower your kids with things like this.

This is why apologetics is so important. We highly, highly, highly, highly, highly recommend for parents to empower your kids with apologetics. Get them armed with this stuff so when they get hit the streets and when they hit the schools and stuff like that, they know how to respond to these kind of very strong assaults, okay? And if your kids are empowered to do so, they have a much better probability of being thinking people and be able to have real discussions with people, change people, not just become sucked up into the common milieu of the popular culture, okay? So I think as we move towards the kingdom, this kind of empowerment is very, very important.

We pray that all families across the world can use these resources. That's why we want to share them with you guys so that you can empower your families. Freedom of responsibility comes with us being the sovereigns of our households and to be able to give our kids, you know, it doesn't mean we have to hide them from evolutionary thought, but at least we have to give them the argument against evolutionary thought, right? We don't have to just shield them from it.

They should learn what most kids are learning in evolutionist thought, but we have to also show them, okay, is this really science though? So great ministries and videos like this help us do that. So I would highly recommend using these resources to have in your family time with your kids.